Biloxi Sun Herald Logo

With the Supreme Court on sidelines, gun control becomes fight over power | Biloxi Sun Herald

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Buy Photos and Pages
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper in Education
    • Subscribe
    • Subscriber Services

    • News
    • Local News
    • Communities
    • Cruisin The Coast
    • Latest News
    • Business
    • Casinos
    • Crime
    • DIPG
    • DHS
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Weather
    • State
    • Nation & World
    • By the Way
    • Hurricane Katrina
    • Sports
    • High School
    • Sports Betting
    • Outdoors
    • New Orleans Saints
    • Biloxi Shuckers
    • Southern Miss
    • Mississippi State
    • Ole Miss
    • New Orleans Pelicans
    • Auto Racing
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Keeping Score
    • Patrick Magee
    • Patrick Ochs
    • Rick Cleveland
    • Brian Allee-Walsh
    • Politics
    • Living
    • Religion
    • Food & Drink
    • Health & Fitness
    • Marquee
    • Calendar
    • Comics
    • Puzzles & Games
    • Ask the Expert
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Entertainment
    • Mardi Gras
    • Arts and Culture
    • Celebrities
    • Comics
    • Dining
    • Horoscopes
    • Framed Photos
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Throwing Shade
    • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • More Opinions
    • Letters
    • Sound Off
    • Cartoons
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Paul Hampton
    • Charlie Mitchell
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

  • About Us

Politics & Government

With the Supreme Court on sidelines, gun control becomes fight over power

By Todd Ruger CQ-Roll Call

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 28, 2016 02:45 PM

WASHINGTON -- The current debate over gun control policy in Washington has Congress and the Obama administration at odds over which branch has more power -- and the Supreme Court has stayed on the sidelines.

President Barack Obama, expressing frustration with Congress not passing gun control measures, announced in January he would act on his own to require more background checks on gun sales.

But two weeks later, Attorney General Loretta Lynch went to Capitol Hill and confirmed what many legal observers noted: The actions seem to restate the current laws. Lynch told Republican lawmakers that the actions don't overstep the president's authority because they don't make new laws.

"They clarify laws that are already on the books -- because clear notice will help ensure that those laws are followed," Lynch testified before a Senate appropriations subcommittee Jan. 20.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Sun Herald

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

But Republicans remain skeptical and appear ready to use their control over federal spending to rein in the executive branch. Rep. John Culberson of Texas has threatened to try to withhold Department of Justice funding for fiscal 2016 if the administration tries to move forward with any of the executive actions.

GOP appropriators also could seek to attach policy riders to spending bills that would block aspects of the executive actions. Richard C. Shelby, R-Ala., chairman of the spending panel that oversees funding for the DOJ, slammed the administration for making an "end-run" around Congress and "engaging in anti-gun theatrics."

"The department is on notice," Shelby, chairman of the Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee, said of the DOJ. "This subcommittee will have no part in undermining the Constitution and the rights it protects."

Amid the debate, the Supreme Court has exercised its right to remain silent when it comes to gun control laws. It's been more than five years since the justices decided a major case over how much lawmakers can limit the Second Amendment's right to own firearms.

Since that 2010 decision, many of the deadliest mass shootings in the nation's history have happened at schools, theaters and other public spaces. Cities and states across the nation have implemented gun control laws in the wake of a growing list of senseless attacks such as the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut in 2012.

The Supreme Court has declined to hear challenge after challenge to laws that ban certain types of guns and bullet magazines, including a high-profile case in December over gun control laws in Highland Park, Ill., that banned assault weapons and magazines that hold more than 10 bullets. When the justices don't hear a case, the laws are left in effect.

There are more challenges headed to the high court soon, giving the justices the opportunity to hear a case and issue a ruling on gun rights laws with a nationwide sweep, if they choose. Yet a majority of the justices don't appear ready to do so, leaving states, localities and, less likely, Congress free to act.

"The problem for gun control advocates is not in the courts, and not the Second Amendment," says Adam Winkler, a constitutional law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, who wrote a book about the gun control debate in America. "The problem is getting laws passed through the legislatures."

The justices might be waiting for a better case, legal experts say. They might be waiting for federal, state and local lawmakers to sort out the highly charged issue. Or they might be unwilling to test how the court as a whole would rule, given the narrow 5-4 rulings in landmark gun rights decisions in 2008 and 2010.

The reasons the Supreme Court stayed out of the Highland Park case and others cannot fully be known outside the walls of the justices' private meetings.

It takes four votes for the Supreme Court to agree to hear a case. While Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, two conservatives, voiced their opinions on the Highland Park case, the other justices did not telegraph their vote or the reasons for it.

Lawyers are preparing to ask the justices early this year to review an appellate court decision from October that upheld core provisions of New York and Connecticut bans on semiautomatic weapons and restrictions on bullet magazines enacted after the Sandy Hook shooting that left 26 dead. That case, however, presents many of the same issues the justices have been comfortable letting stand for now.

Some lawyers think cases challenging laws that restrict permits to carry a concealed gun in public have a greater likelihood of finding four justices willing to hear it.

David Kopel, an adjunct professor of advanced constitutional law at the University of Denver said the justices themselves, looking back at the 5-4 split decisions on the Heller and McDonald gun cases, might be unsure of what side might prevail if they decide to take a case.

"I think one plausible scenario is that none of the justices feels confident about what Justice (Anthony M.) Kennedy would do, and so nobody wants to find out," Kopel says, referring to the man who often holds the swing vote.

Clark Neily, a senior attorney at the libertarian Institute for Justice who also represented the plaintiffs in the Heller case, says he suspects the justices are concerned that "the direction of the law would be moved in the direction they dislike, and they don't know which way it would go."

"I think the Supreme Court recognizes that Second Amendment gun regulation is a very, very politically charged issue," Neily says. "I think they're reluctant to involve themselves unless they perceive it as absolutely necessary."

------

Ryan McCrimmon contributed to this story.

  Comments  

Videos

Why do we have government shutdowns?

Trump: I have ‘absolute right’ to declare national emergency if no deal is reached

View More Video

Trending Stories

Mississippi expected 1,000 jobs at a Gulfport shipyard. But the deal is dead.

February 15, 2019 05:00 AM

Coast buffet, diner, golf club, sushi restaurant get critical violations from health dept.

February 14, 2019 12:07 PM

Memorial Hospital at Gulfport says computer breach exposed patients’ personal information

February 15, 2019 04:31 PM

Southern Miss provides a wild walk-off in season opener. ‘It’s just a culture thing.’

February 15, 2019 09:19 PM

LIVE UPDATES: Southern Miss baseball hosts Purdue

February 15, 2019 04:13 PM

Read Next

Judge sides with Texas landowners over high-speed rail issue

Business

Judge sides with Texas landowners over high-speed rail issue

The Associated Press

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 16, 2019 08:58 AM

A judge has sided with Texas landowners who don't want to sell their land for a proposed high-speed rail line connecting Houston and Dallas.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Sun Herald

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE POLITICS & GOVERNMENT

Business

Hoosier State train route in jeopardy without state funding

February 16, 2019 08:56 AM

National Politics

Why American voters were primed for a president who talks like Trump

February 16, 2019 02:00 AM

National Politics

Shultz protest could hit Starbucks in Democratic regions

February 16, 2019 02:00 AM
Climate change means more floods, great and localized

Nation & World

Climate change means more floods, great and localized

February 16, 2019 09:02 AM

Business

Maine enrolls over 6,000 in MaineCare so far

February 16, 2019 08:50 AM

Business

Lawmaker proposes new tax on hookah and vaping products

February 16, 2019 08:49 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Biloxi Sun Herald App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • e-Edition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
  • Special Sections
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Archives
  • Photo Store
Advertising
  • Start Advertising
  • Place a Classified
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story