Center for Public Integrity finds McDaniel camp is the muddiest

Posted on June 24, 2014 

PAUL HAMPTON

When it comes to slinging mud in politics, it's always the other candidate with the dirty hands. Your campaign is about the issues, the other side is on the attack.

That's been the story of the Mississippi Senate race, one of the muddiest campaign trails since the invention of asphalt.

But who really is on the attack?

The Center for Public Integrity analyzed spending for both sides and in its piece "The Beautification of Thad Cochran," it concludes the long-serving senator has run the more positive race since the June 4 Primary.

Dave Levinthal of Public Integrity says groups backing Cochran have spent $1.25 million on pro-Cochran efforts and just $83,000 attacking his opponent, state Sen. Chris McDaniel.

Levinthal wrote:

"The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spent $700,000 in the runoff phase, trotted out football legend Brett Favre to pitch Cochran to voters. 'Thad always delivers,' Favre says as cheery music plays in the background."

He describes McDaniel backers as "much more cutthroat."

"Of the nearly $2 million they've together spent during the runoff period, the majority - about $1.1 million - funded efforts attacking Cochran."

Read more, and find out who the big spender in the race was at Public Integrity's website.

The Sun Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service